Affirmative Action was a necessity when it went into affect
in 1978 after the court case regarding UC Berkeley put the practice into effect
in regards to education. Now though, in 2013, I’m not so certain that it is
still necessary and relevant.
Dean Shaw
though would vehemently disagree with me. I thought that it was interesting
that he is such a staunch proponent of affirmative action. At Stanford, there
are so many smart and accomplished students from all races and they make their
talents and ability to contribute to Stanford obvious through their
applications. I don’t believe that what their race is makes one student any
more capable at succeeding at Stanford or better suited to studying at Stanford
than a student of a different race.
I hope that
some day we’ll get to a point that race doesn’t matter, but I guess it still
makes a different to colleges, even to a leading university such as Stanford. Dean Shaw says, “It is necessary”. But
why does there have to be diversity in skin color? Why is that the priority?
Shouldn’t diversity in thought and opinions and character on campus be the main
priority in order to better promote “intellectual vitality”?
An on a
similar note: Who cares if Stanford is predominantly made up of Californians or
New Yorkers, for example? If that’s where the majority of the applicants come
from, and they are strong applicants, Stanford shouldn’t be concerned with
admitting too many of them, or a disproportionate amount as compared with other
states. Stanford should be more concerned with letting in the best and the
brightest regardless of the factors that they have no control over: skin color
and where their parents chose to live.
No comments:
Post a Comment