I wasn't too sure what I was expecting before I met David
Harris. Perhaps a flamboyant individual with a loud voice and an equally loud
opinion, gesticulating wildly as he harangues us to believe in his radical
ideologies. You see, I have never met an activist before, and I think of them
as an entirely different species who have the tendency to initiate great
societal changes. But David Harris seems ... normal. He looked like a kind old
man who would smile and wave at you as you take a stroll down the streets, and he
spoke softly, in a measured, even gentlemanly tone. Only the wizened, weathered
face and that mysterious twinkle in his eyes gave a hint of the hardships and
battles he had fought.
If I have to choose a word to describe David Harris, it
would be "calm". Throughout the entire conversation, he was never agitated,
not even when he talked about events where he was physically assaulted and
abused. All his methods of revolt - peaceful return of draft cards, his patient
wait for his imminent arrest for being a draft evader (most other evaders fled
to Canada), and his leading of hunger strikes, were non-violent, peaceful acts
of civil disobedience that exude an impregnable spirit who believed in his
convictions strongly enough to understand that they do not need to justified by
non-violence. And all that was done to
save people living on the other side of the globe whom he had never met.
Yet, despite his extraordinary deeds, David Harris seemed
human. "The hardest part was never standing up to the government. That
hardest part was facing your parents, " he said. Despite his idealistic views,
his greatest fear was the way his parents would react when they knew their son
had gone to jail. It was a natural, ordinary emotion, one that made the idea of
an activist more realistic: an individual with the same concerns as you and I,
but chose to overcome them in pursuit of the idealistic causes they believe in.
David Harris was sort of the first true activist I have ever
met. It's hard to meet one in Singapore, where things tend to be pretty mundane.
Elections are not very interesting; a dominant party always wins, and the
opposition parties never seemed strong enough to be a viable alternative
(thankfully, that seems to be changing in recent years). Strikes and
demonstrations are also strictly prohibited by law. Well, we do have a channel where
opinions can be voiced; a Speaker's Corner was created in 2000 to allow people
to speak freely about any issue, ONLY after they have gotten a police permit to
do so. Despite this, I used to think that I'm pretty well versed about the
state of things in the world. When
studying the Arab-Israeli conflict in high school, I eagerly followed the
latest happenings in the Middle East on the news. When the Jasmine Revolutions
broke out, or when there were territorial disputes in the regions, my friends
and I would hold long discussions about these issues. Yet, I now realize that
these issues have only hit me on an intellectual level; I was in the
perspective of a scientist taking a bird's eye view of everything. Of course, I
feel for the people, but their experiences were so surreal, so far away and I
was to some extent emotionally detached. I wasn't able to turn their
experiences into something personal. I hope to change that in my remaining
years in Stanford. I hope to find some cause I believe in and can connect to
personally, and do something about it. The cause does not have to be so serious
that it could get me into jail, but I hope that it is big enough to get me
frightened about the consequences.
No comments:
Post a Comment