Dean Shaw admitted that it’s a “fact of life that humanities
majors have to deal with a lack of understanding” regarding their major choice
and future career path since it might not be “tied to a vocational practice.”
I believe
that your undergraduate major doesn’t have to dictate your career. Humanities
students actually get admitted in higher percentages in some cases to graduate
schools than a more defined, straight shot major. A humanities major has skill
sets that a CS major or engineering major have: a greater appreciation for
philosophical knowledge and learning, and better writing and interpretive
skills in many cases. Now, I am a bit biased because I am an American Studies
major and if I don’t include that I’m following it up with law school, people
look at me like I’m crazy. But who cares if I’m going to graduate school or not
with a humanities major?
Your major
doesn’t affect your job acceptance always. In many cases, it’s hands on
experience and research that matter the most. I have very interested in sports
media and sports law. Well, there’s no straight shot major for that. What’s
going to help me get a job is that internship or job at a sports law firm or
newspaper that is going to be most impressive (and of course just any degree
from Stanford makes a huge difference as well).
Dean Saller
started his first year at UCLA in engineering before switching to Classics and
now he wants to work to bridge the gap between the “fuzzies” and “techies” and
increase the diversity of interests on campus. IHum was created to do this but
in the end it just created animosity towards the humanities. That’s when they
switched to requirement to Thinking Matters. I think it has been widely
accepted since it allows students more freedom in developing their own
humanities curriculum. And let’s me honest, in the end, students hate being
told what to do.
No comments:
Post a Comment